RetroSearch Browse

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-January/032560.html below:

native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)

[Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python) [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)Barry A. Warsaw barry@python.org
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:25:57 -0500

Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "GG" == Graham Guttocks <graham_guttocks@yahoo.co.nz> writes:

    GG> It would be nice to use Python for more serious projects, but
    GG> it isn't fast enough currently.

Really?  How many of these 2100+ projects (just to pick a few at
random <wink>) aren't serious?

http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php?form_cat=178

-Barry

Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4