Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
> [me]
>> def foo [property]:
>> ...
>>
>> anyone? Probably relying on the difference between [ and ( kills it.
>
> Yes.
>
> How about
>
> foo = property:
> ...
Well on a purely instinctive level, I think it's horrible.
What does it do? I seem to have missed a concise explanation, and
a few minutes of thread trawling hasn't found one.
In general I agree with Samuele: aiming for a one size fits all
sysntactic extension is fruitless unless it's essentially macros and I
thought consesnus was we didn't want them.
Cheers,
M.
--
languages shape the way we think, or don't.
-- Erik Naggum, comp.lang.lisp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4