Paul, I'd like to see what you think of my alternate proposal that does away with the keyword altogether. > By the way, can I just say that I am +1 on Michael Hudson's original > patch for [...] on definitions. Even though it doesn't solve the > issue of properties, I think it's a nice solution for classmethod > and staticmethod, and again I like the generality. I hope that everyone involved in this discussion understands that none of this goes into Python 2.3. We've promised syntactic stability, and that's what people will get. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4