Oren Tirosh <oren-py-d@hishome.net> writes: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:22:52PM +0000, Michael Hudson wrote: >> >> So we're around to suggesting >> >> def <arbitrary-rvalue>(params): >> ... > > I hope you're joking... Well, not entirely. I was more trying to tease out of you what you intended. > Just in case you are not: a fully-qualified name consists of identifiers > separated by dots. I hadn't seen the phrase "fully-qualified name" used in this thread; it wasn't obvious to me that any such limitation was implied. I may have missed something, of course. > It's not an arbitrary expression. At least that's how > it works in the Python module namespace. But as a generalisation of "foo=new.function(CODE, GLOBS, 'foo')", what I mentioned would be valid too. I'm not sure it's *sensible*, but that's a different kettle of fish... Cheers, M. -- ... Windows proponents tell you that it will solve things that your Unix system people keep telling you are hard. The Unix people are right: they are hard, and Windows does not solve them, ... -- Tim Bradshaw, comp.lang.lisp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4