Manuel Garcia wrote:
> def _junk():
> a = long_expression01(x0, y0)
> b = long_expression02(x1, y1)
> c = long_expression03(x2, y2)
> return min(a,b,c), max(a,b,c)
> d, e = _junk()
> del _junk()
>
> with the purpose being keeping a,b,c out of our nice clean namespace.
Don't you mean _junk? a,b,c are locals.
I suppose you could do something like this (though it
may seem a bit perverse here):
def d():
a = long_expression01(x0, y0)
b = long_expression02(x1, y1)
c = long_expression03(x2, y2)
return min(a,b,c), max(a,b,c)
d, e = d()
> j = block:
> def _get_j(self): return self._j
> def _set_j(self, j): self._j = j
> return property(_get_j, _set_j, None, 'dynamite!')
This doesn't seem quite as bad to me, though (YMMV):
def j():
def _get_j(self): return self._j
def _set_j(self, j): self._j = j
return property(_get_j, _set_j, None, 'dynamite!')
j = j()
Not that I have any issues with your suggestion. I
especially like the fact it can be used to implement
"real" lambdas.
-Jerry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4