Greg Ewing <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> writes:
> Do we want to be able to define and/or override
> get/set/del methods individually?
As opposed to?
The rationale for introducing the extended function syntax is that
extended functions should be introduced by means of a definition, not
of an assignment. For the same reason, I think properties should not
be introduced by means of an assignment. I can't picture how *not* to
define them individually, unless you are thinking of something like
property foo:
def get(self):
...
def set(self, value):
...
> Whatever the mechanism, here's my current thoughts
> on a property syntax:
>
> def foo.get(self):
> ...
>
> def foo.set(self, x):
> ...
>
> def foo.del(self):
> ...
So would you also be in favour of defining static methods through
def static foo():
...
?
Regards,
Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4