A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-January/032125.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 290 revisited

[Python-Dev] PEP 290 revisitedRaymond Hettinger python@rcn.com
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:36:24 -0500
From: "Kevin Altis" <altis@semi-retired.com>

> Implementing all the changes of PEP 290 does take time and focus. I would
> set aside at least an hour per file for a thorough set of changes,
> meticulously double-checking the patch diffs, etc.

Yes.  It takes a lot a care to do it right.

> It will be up to you and the other
> developers to decide how much effort you want to put into conforming to PEP
> 290.

I wouldn't use the word conform.  The spirit of the PeP
was to provide some clues to those looking to take
advantage of a recent language feature.  The clues 
include how to find a potential update, what change
to make, what the benefit would be, and more importantly
what cues indicate that the change might be inappropriate.


Raymond Hettinger

 

#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4