[NeilS] > > > It would be really cool if this worked: > > > > > > import time > > > now = property(lambda m: time.time()) > > > > > > Obviously a silly example but I hope the idea is clear. Is there a > > > reason this couldn't be made to work? [Me] > > The idea is not clear to me at all. Why can't you say > > > > now = lambda: time.time() [Brian Q] > Presumably, he would prefer this syntax: > > start = time.now > > to: > > start = time.now() Aha. > The .NET framework implements "now" as a property rather than a function > and I find it distasteful for some reason. I have to agree with you -- I am -1 on such a feature. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4