> I would advise to follow Tim's strategy: Make TLS part of the thread_* > files, accept that on some threading configuration, there won't be TLS > until somebody implements it, and make TLS usage part of the core > instead of part of the extension module. > > I doubt any of the potential TLS providers supports more than Win32 or > pthreads. Yeah, I'm not crazy on the idea myself - but I think it has merit. I'm thinking mainly of xpcom, which has pretty reasonable support beyond pthreads and win32 - but I am more than happy to stick it in the YAGNI basket. Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4