[Walter] > >>So should I go on with this? Do we want to change all tests before 2.3 > >>is finished, or start changing them after 2.3 is released > >>(or something in between)? > > [GvR] > > I'd say something in between. It's probably good if someone (not me) > > reviews your patches. [Walter] > Definitely. Any volunteers? I'll review a few of these but cannot sign-up for the whole ball game because of time constraints, inability to run certain modules, and trying to review only things I thoroughly understand. My own hope for your project is that new tests are made, coverage increased, interfaces are checked to the document specification, and bugs are found. I'm much less enthusiastic about having existing tests converted to unittest format. Raymond Hettinger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4