On 07 January 2003, Guido van Rossum said:
> It should work, except setup.py hasn't been fixed to build it. Here's
> a patch:
Err, yeah, I have a similar patch on my local copy, but I haven't
checked it in yet because of this:
> Also, I note that the compilation of ossaudiodev should really be
> dependent on the existence of either <linux/soundcard.h> (Linux) or
> <machine/soundcard.h> (BSD).
and, come to think of it, this:
> However, then the test suite fails:
>
> $ ./python ../Lib/test/regrtest.py test_ossaudiodev.py
> test_ossaudiodev
> test test_ossaudiodev produced unexpected output:
> **********************************************************************
> *** lines 2-7 of actual output doesn't appear in expected output after line 1:
is another good reason not to check that setup.py change in. ;-) That
one's easy: I never copied output/test_linuxaudiodev to
output/test_ossaudiodev. Done now, trying it out, will check in soon.
I'll let someone else worry about activating ossaudiodev on FreeBSD.
> What's up with that, Greg? I've seen tons of checkins to ossaudiodev
> -- how close is it to completion?
I'm fairly happy with the code now. (I think -- haven't looked at it
since last week.) Have some preliminary docs supplied by the guy who
wrote the mixer interface (Nick FitzRoy-Dale) that I have to look at and
beef up. I also have crazy ideas about writing an extensive, and noisy,
test script that would go in Tools or sandbox or something. But the
module itself is pretty good now.
Greg
--
Greg Ward <gward@python.net> http://www.gerg.ca/
I joined scientology at a garage sale!!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4