--=-=-=
Ralf describes below a change in the name of classes defined in the
__main__ module for 2.3a1, which causes some of our tests to fail.
Was it intentional?
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
X-From-Line: rwgk@cci.lbl.gov Mon Jan 6 15:00:56 2003
Return-Path: <rwgk@cci.lbl.gov>
Received: from boa.lbl.gov ([128.3.132.98] verified)
by stlport.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
with ESMTP id 162837 for dave@boost-consulting.com; Mon, 06 Jan 2003
15:00:57 -0800
Received: (from rwgk@localhost)
by boa.lbl.gov (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h06N0uv368572;
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:00:56 -0800 (PST)
From: "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk@cci.lbl.gov>
Message-Id: <200301062300.h06N0uv368572@boa.lbl.gov>
To: dave@boost-consulting.com
Subject: Trouble with Python 2.3a1
Cc: rwgk@boa.lbl.gov
X-Content-Length: 399
Lines: 17
Xref: NEFARIOUS mail.misc:17942
MIME-Version: 1.0
Hi David,
I am back from my trip and I thought it is time to test our stuff with
Python 2.3a1. Using the boost 1.29.0 release pickling of simple
extension classes fails. I tracked this down to the following
difference:
Python 2.2:
<class 'cctbx_boost.uctbx_ext.unit_cell'>
Python 2.3a1:
<class '__main__.cctbx_boost.uctbx_ext.unit_cell'>
Have you encountered this already?
Thanks,
Ralf
--=-=-=
--
David Abrahams
dave@boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
--=-=-=--
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4