"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk@cci.lbl.gov> writes: > Hi David, > > I am back from my trip and I thought it is time to test our stuff with > Python 2.3a1. Using the boost 1.29.0 release pickling of simple > extension classes fails. I tracked this down to the following > difference: > > Python 2.2: > <class 'cctbx_boost.uctbx_ext.unit_cell'> > > Python 2.3a1: > <class '__main__.cctbx_boost.uctbx_ext.unit_cell'> > > Have you encountered this already? Nope, I haven't. I'm cc:'ing the python developers on this reply. Was this an intentional change, guys? -- David Abrahams dave@boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4