At 1:54 PM -0500 2/27/03, Damien Morton wrote:
>In general, it would seem that adding opcodes in bulk, even if many opcodes
>switch to the same labels, results in a minor performance loss.
While I'm somewhat loathe to help you guys go faster (that whole pie
thing) you might want to take a look at commonly used pairs of
opcodes and reordering the code in the switch body so pairs are
adjacent and more likely to be in cache.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4