On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Brett Cannon wrote: > Is there enough interest to actually put the time and effort into > attempting to develop new regex syntax? I would be excited about this. I've long dreamed of a more human-friendly way to do regular expressions. Let's see if there's interest here, and if there is enough, perhaps we can discuss the details on a separate list (no point in having more syntax arguments on python-dev until there's a concrete proposal, i think). > Ping has a module at http://lfw.org/python/rxb15.py that creates regexes > patterns using a much more straight-forward syntax by using actual words > to represent things; there are functions like 'maybe', 'exactly', etc. > (don't know how powerful it is, though; he just showed it to me briefly > two weeks ago). It can do most things that i use regular expressions for. I used it regularly for a while, but it's somewhat slow. -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4