> > p.s.: I would probably have done the exception saving > > in the caller's frame, where it belongs, IMHO. > > I'm going to see if this is feasible. The current method is almost > certainly more efficient, but seems very backwards. Watch out though. There are situations where an exception needs to be stored but no frame is available (when executing purely in C). There is always a thread state. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4