> > But the rest is still impressive; I can't remember what we did... > > Pymalloc? New-style object construction speedups? Faster getitem and > setitem paths? These are just a few things that made speed differences in > our app. I'm not familiar enough with pystone to know if (or which) of > these are the lucky winners... Probably pymalloc, plus some function call speedups that Jeremy added very recently. Pystone doesn't use new-style objects. I don't recall what we changed in getitem/setitem. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4