From: "Tim Peters" <tim.one@comcast.net> > Hmm. Have you ever met a coercion you didn't like <0.9 wink>? After Neal's changes to PyArg_ParseTuple, will Tim still be able to use a floating argument to the wink() function which has only been documented to accept a boolean state? Alternatively, will the wink() implementation accept a FixedPoint object so that ten <0.1 winks> will reliably sum exactly to a full wink? On comp.lang.py, the currently leading proposal is to tighten the semantics to boolean but to support backward compatibility for partial winks through an explictly named function: blink(). Raymond Hettinger _ ~ @ @ \_/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4