> They have to be group nobody or nogroup (depending on distribution) > and group readable. World readable is not needed. Though that is usually the intention of those groups... > > So I'm still not convinced. Or are there sites that > > actually publish their log files on the web? What would the point of > > that be? I'd be surprised if there wasn't a lot of other > > privacy-sensitive data in such log files, and the complainers should > > complain about the public logs rather than focusing on Python trying > > to issue a useful error message. > > True, but why stir up more noise ? The whole idea in itself > has already caused endless discussions. The fact that people are concerned about privacy doesn't mean they aren't wrong. > The message now prints the file name and the line number. I think > that's good enough. > > BTW, there's also another reason not to print the source code line: > since we know it contains non-ASCII data, it would clutter up the > log file, possibly making it useless to other programs reading > it. The same it true for interactive terminal sessions that could > start to behave in strange ways after printing what they think are > control characters. Now that's a reason I can support. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4