On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 14:31, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I think mktemp()'s API is unchanged if you don't count the warning > (which I disabled anyway). However the name template used for > temporary files is very different -- could this affect applications? It shouldn't affect any applications, but I'm sure it will. The pattern is so simple that there's probably code to delete tempfiles based on the pattern. Some unfortunate program probably uses mktemp() + re to get the pid <0.9 wink>. However, we can add the two new functions and have them use the new pattern. This won't break any existing code, but will let people fix their programs without upgrading to 2.3. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4