RetroSearch Browse

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-February/033366.html below:

[Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize?

[Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize? [Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize?Roman Suzi rnd@onego.ru
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:42:27 +0300 (MSK)

Previous message: [Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize?
Next message: [Python-Dev] Codecs data
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Greg Ewing wrote:

>Lalo Martins <lalo@laranja.org>:
>
>> I just realized I'm finally tired of typing "Explicit is better than
>> implicit".  Can we agree to call this maxim EIBTI?
>
>Or we could follow the Ferengi and just assign numbers
>to the Rules of Pythonicness.

Oh... I am preparing a PEP with the word "Implicit" in the title. Is it doomed
to be rejected out-right?

I do not like abbreviation EIBTI. It contradicts SIBTC, SIBTD and RC ;-)

Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
-- 
rnd@onego.ru =\= My AI powered by Linux RedHat 7.3

Previous message: [Python-Dev] [meta] EIBTI: can we acronimize?
Next message: [Python-Dev] Codecs data
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4