From: "Chermside, Michael" <mchermside@ingdirect.com> [Samuele Pedroni creates list of # of posts per person] It was mostly for my personal curiosity. But once the work done, I thought to share. >I'm not quite sure how you generated this list, but I notice not by hand <wink>, with a ~200 lines python script using nttplib >that I'm not on it. Now I *HAVE* been trying very hard to make >FEW posts (but hopefully insightful ones), but I still made >it to the threshold of 3. Yup, there was a small bug in the names/addresses coalescing code, you were counted 1 time for 2 posts and one time for 1, Now it is fixed. >I don't particularly care about the list, I would file it mostly under too much information, The relevant data for me was that 1/4, 1/2 of the total posts were made by just a small "vocal" group of people > but if Guido wants >a listing of who's pro/con, The last time I have ran the script I got 155 different posters, I think nobody is going to sieve through the nuances of their writings to report their opinion. There will be the vote for that. > then we shouldn't exclude people >who have tried to REDUCE the amount of noise by posting a >SMALL number of times. That was never my intention, the threshold of 3 was arbitrary and the list as such was not my goal. I think I will run the script again before the vote, because I'm interested in the debaters/voters ratio. regards.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4