On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 12:26 PM, Stuart Bishop wrote: > cc:'d to Aaron for the horses mouth opinion if the email address I have > is still valid. After remembering where Aaron now works, and emailing the following to his *correct* address, I got a 'Yes, no problem'. msg_to_aaron = """ I don't know if you saw this thread or not on Python-dev: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-January/032295.html Looks like Gadfly can go into the core Python distribution. One of the outstanding issues is that of the licence, which concerned Guido: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-January/032305.html Would you be interested in allowing the PSF to distribute Gadfly under its own licence to simplify things? """ So it looks like everything is fine, at least after we can extricate the keyboard Anthony managed to embed in his forehead. Speaking of which, should we proceed assuming nothing will be included until we have a a replacement for kjbuckets? If this isn't a requirement and we can proceed with the existing C code (with fallback to pure python), then we might be able to get this into 2.3 alpha 2. Otherwise I can give in to my inherent laziness and assume 2.3.1 or 2.4. Do I need a PEP, given that adding this as a module seems generally accepted both in python-dev and the DB SIG? -- Stuart Bishop <zen@shangri-la.dropbear.id.au> http://shangri-la.dropbear.id.au/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4