People wrote: > > > A bit of investigation showed that the bug exists because of that line: > > > <a href="http://ss"title="pe">P</a> > > Which is blatantly invalid HTML, of course. > Well, same for me, but as OP said, the w3c validator says the page is ok. I've opened a bug report on this: http://www.python.org/sf/683938 I generally take the position that the "letter of the law" is all we should worry about in cases like this, but the fact that the W3C validator tells me "the law" isn't exactly interested in this distinction. So we should at least tolerate this construct since it isn't *ambiguous* -- it's just not legal. "Be lenient in what you accept, strict in what you generate." Or something like that. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4