Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
> (In fact, it seems that ?: has an advantage over the PEP's proposal
> because the ?: stand out more than the 'if' and 'else' keywords.)
This was the thing that surprised me the most when I tried to use the
new syntax for a bit. My internal parser just saw
return NAME.NAME NAME NAME.NAME NAME NAME
and gave up.
Cheers,
M.
--
For their next act, they'll no doubt be buying a firewall
running under NT, which makes about as much sense as
building a prison out of meringue. -- -:Tanuki:-
-- http://home.xnet.com/~raven/Sysadmin/ASR.Quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4