[M.-A. Lemburg] > Good plan :-) > Except maybe one nit: some of us here in python-dev don't read > c.l.p, so their vote wouldn't get taken into account. The trend of discussions seem to suggest that the result of that effort will be summarised by statistics: this syntactic construct, this number of votes. But the spirit of a PEP, if I understand it well, is mainly to register the outcome of all discussions, opinions and reasons behind them, and how these were weighted and pondered into any final decision. The idea is that later newcomers can then be directed to its PEP whenever a subject pops up again. One problem here is that the PEP author (Guido) does not intend to follow the whole discussion, admittedly fluent in these days. How will it be reported then, in the spirit of a PEP, that is, more than mere statistics? -- François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4