> Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>: > > OK, I'll write a PEP (I doubt waiting for Eric is gonna pay off). [Eric] > Surprise. It might. My trip to Boston tonight got canned, and I > have nothing else on my schedule. Too late. :-) See PEP 308. > Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>: > > I think you can't separate the two votes so easily. If I vote for a > > ternary operator, but then something with an ugly syntax wins the > > design contest, I may wish I had voted against in the first place. > > It's say vote "for" the first, and if you don't like the second exert > your BDFL veto. I don't think anybody would kick -- and if they do I'll > give 'em a stiff talking-to. OK, I think you saw the PEP then. :-) But the voting procedure is up to c.l.py. Let's see them screw this one up. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4