[Michael Hudson] > So, crazy idea for the morning. Split that sentence up: have one list > (probably the existing python-dev) where the future of the language is > discussed. Have another (python-implementors) where anything that > does not have a short-to-medium term effect on the code in Python CVS > is strictly forbidden. Can this be made to work? Or maybe the last > month or so has been the exception and this list will just naturally > reqcquire some of it's focus. > I am +0 on this. I would think that even more pie-in-the-sky ideas would come out if we had a list specifically garnered towards long-term ideas (unless, of course, we regulate subscriptions). And then my personal question becomes whether I will need to summarize two lists instead of one (I am guessing no; the one dealing with the blue-sky issues will need it more than the other one). -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4