> >> I'm mildly concerned about giving extension opcodes specifically to > >> "Zope 3". Is there some reason we shouldn't just make that "Zope"? > > > > I doubt that Zope 2 will ever be using pickle protocol 2. > > > > Anyway, the class names are all different, so Zope 2 and Zope 3 would > > require different extension ranges. > > Actually, I was thinking more about Zope 4. ;-) My point was that > for all the interaction between Python and Zope, they're separate > software products, and I don't think the PSF should get involved in > Zope version numbers. Just give the range to Zope and let them > decide how to use it. Sure. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4