> Um. That's a tough bar, particularly given that some people are in > favor of a ternary operator, but only if it has a "reasonable" syntax. > I'm going to want separate votes for "should there be a ternary > operator?" and "what syntax should it have?" If there's a clear > majority for the first part, but not the second part, I'd like instead > of being rejected forever, to be put on hold for a minimum of a year. I think you can't separate the two votes so easily. If I vote for a ternary operator, but then something with an ugly syntax wins the design contest, I may wish I had voted against in the first place. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4