> Oh dear. If you are really going to do these these cutesy English-like
> expressions I'd have to resurrect my old proposal of:
>
> if CONDITION for some NAME in ITERABLE:
> if CONDITION for every NAME in ITERABLE:
> if CONDITION for no NAME in ITERABLE:
>
> Please, dont make me do that ;-)
An if-expression is frequently requested, and I expect people will
continue to ask for it until I add one :-)
Who (besides you) has ever asked for generalized quantifiers? They
were in ABC, with slightly different syntax:
>>> IF EACH x IN {3; 6; 9} HAS x mod 3 = 0: WRITE "Yes"
Yes
>>>
But they weren't useful enough IMO to bother incorporating at the
time.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4