On Wed, Feb 05, 2003, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > Now, we're lucky since meta-classes or writing importers is not > all that easy. With thunks the situation will be much like giving > macros to Python programmers: you'll see a proliferation of new > meta-constructs in all kinds of programs and in the end lose the > maintainability argument which is still one of the strongest ones for > using Python in the first place. That's true only if we permit generalized thunks. I've been pushing for simplified thunks; nevertheless "thunk" is a useful term for the discussions we're having. -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Register for PyCon now! http://www.python.org/pycon/reg.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4