Gary Herron <gherron@islandtraining.com>:
> On Thursday 06 February 2003 02:20 pm, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > Andrew Koenig <ark@research.att.com>:
> > > Eric> Yeeeouch. And the proposed n-ary form is even worse.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, we already have the problem with list comprehensions:
> > >
> > > [f(i) for i in range(n) if g(i)]
> > >
> > > Here, every evaluation of f(i) is preceded by an evaluation of g(i).
> >
> > Uh...but this is one of the reasons I never liked list comprehensions.
>
> Perhaps because I'm a mathematician, I find the list comprehensions
> very comfortable. It corresponds quite well with the mathematical
> notation for defining sets: {2*x | for all x in someSet}
I used to be a matrhematical logician. This doesn't help me like it
any better, I'm afraid.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4