Ooh! We can't blame this one on the peephole opt, right? In current CVS: >>> -int("0xffffffff", 0) # and this does not generate a wng 1 >>> int("-0xffffffff", 0) -4294967295L >>> As in the tail end of the last msg, the base specifier makes a big difference here too: >>> -int("ffffffff", 16) -4294967295L >>> int("-ffffffff", 16) -4294967295L >>>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4