> > So desirable or not, re-adding --without-cycle-gc may be *hard*. > > I don't think so. When I read the latest CVS version, > I also stumbled on the new-born relationship between > trashcan and GC, but forgot to complain about it. > My original implementation abused the ob_type field > of the objects, which looked insane for some > developers. > But insane or not, I really dislike that for sanity, > GC is no longer an option. I know of many companies > (all my Stackless customers, for instance), who > would *never* switch to a Python version that needs > the GC. You can help by volunteering to maintain the code that is needed for making GC optional. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4