Oren Tirosh <oren-py-d@hishome.net> writes:
> I agree. I don't see anything wrong with
>
> f=open('spam', 'r')
> with autoclose(f):
> ...
I *like* this way of doing autoclose files. Much better than the way
I've been thinking
f = autocloser("spam")
with f:
...
> and I think that
>
> with autolock(obj):
> ...
>
> looks better than any other alternative proposed so far.
On the other hand, I quite like
with lock:
...
(where lock is defined appropriately).
I don't know. Does the fact that the same statement is best used in
two subtly different ways (permanent object vs throwaway helper
object) count as a disadvantage of the statement (in terms of
teachability, if nothing else...)?
Sigh. I'm *so* glad I'm just skimming the thunk discussion - I don't
think my brain would survive the details :-)
Paul.
--
This signature intentionally left blank
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4