A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-February/032925.html below:

[Python-Dev] With statement

[Python-Dev] With statementDuncan Booth duncan@rcp.co.uk
Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:07:54 -0000
On 4 Feb 2003 at 16:45, Moore, Paul wrote:
> My actual preference is for a lock object with enter = acquire and
> leave = release. Then, the idiom is
> 
>     with my_lock:
>         # protected code
> 
> This requires a separate enter hook.

As opposed to:

    with lock(my_lock):
        # protected code

which wouldn't.

I prefer the second, but I'm not entirely sure why. I think, 
maybe, it's because the parentheses in the second one tell me 
we are actually doing something, whereas the first one looks 
like a variable access which is the one thing that can't 
actually have side effects.

It's probably just that I've been playing with C# too much 
recently (where the 'using' statement requires you to create 
an object). :-(
-- 
Duncan Booth                                             
duncan@dales.rmplc.co.uk
int month(char *p){return(124864/((p[0]+p[1]-
p[2]&0x1f)+1)%12)["\5\x8\3"
"\6\7\xb\1\x9\xa\2\0\4"];} // Who said my code was obscure?
http://dales.rmplc.co.uk/Duncan




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4