Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-February/032891.html below:

native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> IIRC the largest expense in function calls is setting up the frame
> object for the new function to use.  I don't think there are any
> low-hanging fruit here, because the frame model is pretty deeply
> embedded in the interpreter.  It seems like all the work in
> PyEval_EvalCodeEx() has to get done sometime.

Then that's where we should have a clean fresh look.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4