From: "Greg Ewing" <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> > Guido: > > > If we want to support thunks that blend into the scope of their > > environment as well as thunks that introduce a new local scope, here's > > one possible way to do it: > > Do we actually want both kinds of thunk? Why, exactly? > The second kind (lambda) are essentially just function objects and their corresponding syntax is just sugar. We need a third too, because 'class' has still different rules wrt scoping. The first kind is needed to do even more general things than what 'with' would allow. From the prososal it seems that now they cannot take parameters.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4