Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-February/032866.html below:

native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: Guido van Rossum
>
> > I meant continuing work started by Ping, Jeremy, and you on non-local
> > namespaces (something other than dicts).  Tim's suggestion of optimizing
> > function calls sounds like another good one.
>
> Ah, you mean these:
>
>     - PEP 266  Optimizing Global Variable/Attribute Access  Montanaro
>       PEP 267  Optimized Access to Module Namespaces        Hylton
>       PEP 280  Optimizing access to globals                 van Rossum
>
> Yes, that would be a good idea too.
>
> And I suggest that we analyze pystone (or whatever benchmark we decide
> to use).

Don't forget Marc-Andre Lemburg's pybench

 http://www.egenix.com/files/python/

 http://www.egenix.com/files/python/pybench-1.0.zip

ka

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4