Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-February/032862.html below:

native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I meant continuing work started by Ping, Jeremy, and you on non-local
> namespaces (something other than dicts).  Tim's suggestion of optimizing
> function calls sounds like another good one.

Ah, you mean these:

    - PEP 266  Optimizing Global Variable/Attribute Access  Montanaro
      PEP 267  Optimized Access to Module Namespaces        Hylton
      PEP 280  Optimizing access to globals                 van Rossum

Yes, that would be a good idea too.

And I suggest that we analyze pystone (or whatever benchmark we decide
to use).

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4