> At 12:00 PM +0100 2/3/03, Christian Tismer wrote: > >Dan Sugalski wrote: > >... > > > >>If you want to bet, I'll put up $10 and a round of beer (or other > >>beverage of your choice) at OSCON 2004 for all the python labs & > >>zope folks that says parrot beats the current python interpreter > >>when running all the python benchmark suite programs (that don't > >>depend on extensions written in C, since we're shooting for pure > >>engine performance) from bytecode. Game? > > > >Do you mean the current Python interpreter of 2004? > >That could be quite a different beast... > > While it could be, that's unlikely. Still, that'd be part of the > ground rules we'd work out if someone takes me up on the challenge. I'm in. Given how low you set your stakes, I don't think you're very confident, so I'd like to call your bluff. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4