From: Walter D=F6rwald [mailto:walter@livinglogic.de] > A use case I can think of is some kind of XML DOM API (Ruby > does something like that with it's cgi module, where node > content is created inside a block). [...] OK, I see this. I don't personally have much of a need for it, but that's beside the point. The proposed with syntax isn't going to cover this (obviously), so I'd suggest that the discussion on thunks concentrate on how they might handle the two cases of properties and this XML use. At least, that's what I'd like to see in order to get a better idea of how the thunk discussion is heading :-) Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4