Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-February/032780.html below:

native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Extended Function syntax
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dan Sugalski wrote:
...

> If you want to bet, I'll put up $10 and a round of beer (or other 
> beverage of your choice) at OSCON 2004 for all the python labs & zope 
> folks that says parrot beats the current python interpreter when running 
> all the python benchmark suite programs (that don't depend on extensions 
> written in C, since we're shooting for pure engine performance) from 
> bytecode. Game?

Do you mean the current Python interpreter of 2004?
That could be quite a different beast...

ciao - chris

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Extended Function syntax
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: native code compiler? (or, OCaml vs. Python)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4