A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-February/032709.html below:

[Python-Dev] Extended Function syntax

[Python-Dev] Extended Function syntax [Python-Dev] Extended Function syntaxSamuele Pedroni pedronis@bluewin.ch
Sat, 1 Feb 2003 20:45:56 +0100
From: "Guido van Rossum" <guido@python.org>
>
> I'm confused.  You & Samuele both sometimes have a rhetorical style
> that leaves me with no idea of the point you're trying to make.
>
> Please say it outright.

is this the reason why you have not given much feedback on my "rants"?

for example do you agree or disagree that it bad to have scoping rules for some
piece of code that depend on some user code somewhere else and that can
sometime be quite ambiguous at first glance?  Thus the 'class'-like scoping
rules case should be syntactically distinguishable from the inline-suite-like
case?





RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4