RetroSearch Browse

Wed Dec 31 19:39:05 EST 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041544.html

> >Could you run pystone too?
> >
> >   python -c 'from test.pystone import main; main(); main(); main()'
> >
> >and then report the smallest pystones/second value.
> 
> Smallest is:
> 
> Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 6.61
> This machine benchmarks at 7564.3 pystones/second

Thanks -- though I made a mistake -- I should've asked for the largest
pystone value -- larger is better for pystone, unlike for running
times.  Anyway, this value is reasonable given your parrotbench time.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041544.html below:

[Python-Dev] Are we collecting benchmark results across machines