A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041432.html below:

[Python-Dev] Fixes for imageop module

[Python-Dev] Fixes for imageop module [Python-Dev] Fixes for imageop moduleGuido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Dec 26 17:49:43 EST 2003
> I have some fixes for the imageop module to make it work on systems with 
> a different byte-order than IRIX (e.g. Linux).  Shall I check them in or 
> is it not worth it for such an old module?  Anything else that needs to 
> be changed when I check this in?
> The fixes of course will result in different results on Linux than 
> before, so that's the main reason for asking.

I don't see imageop in the list of deprecated modules in PEP 4, and
apparently *you* are still using it, so as long as you don't mind
being potentially the sole maintainer and user, I don't mind these
being in the distribution.

What do you mean by different results on Linux?  Was this module
previously doing something bogus there?

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4