> > [Paul Moore] > > > ... > > > The fact that [None] compares less than every other value is to me > > > incidental, and arbitrary. > > > > Arbitrary?! I clearly recall when the decision was made that None would > > compare less than anything else. I was in the same room with Guido, and > > this is a verbatim transcript of the debate: > <snip> > > Two lines of code later, the Only Objectively Correct result was achieved. > > > > history-is-more-impressive-in-textbooks-ly y'rs - tim > > > How about "everything" or "all" as the obverse of "none", ordered higher > than all other values? "Some" is far too indeterminate. > > Dave LeBlanc > Seattle, WA USA All seems like a reasonable spelling for an object with the given behavior. I started with the name Some because the name made me smile. - Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4