A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-December/041392.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python threads end up blocking signals in subprocesses

[Python-Dev] Python threads end up blocking signals in subprocesses [Python-Dev] Python threads end up blocking signals in subprocessesJeff Epler jepler at unpythonic.net
Mon Dec 22 17:38:20 EST 2003
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:23:11PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> How hard would it be to reimplement our own system() and popen() using
> only POSIX calls, for POSIX systems?  I've always thought of these to
> be pretty simple combinations of fork() and exec(), with an assumption
> of a working /bin/sh.  Without error checking:

Yeah -- this is something we could do if necessary.  the opengroup
standard lists a few more things to "get right" in terms of signal
handling for system(), but we can do all those in C or in Python..

Jeff

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4