> The biggest "clarity" issue I have with the dot notation is that > there's no obvious keyword to look up when you want to find out what's > going on. The best you could do is look up the "import" section of the > manual. Heaven help you if you want to use Google. (Has anyone tried > to get any meaningful information from Google on Microsoft's two > technologies, COM and .NET? You'd almost think they'd done it > deliberately... > > Seriously, the "what do I search for?" factor bugs me every time I hit > it. There's no deep reason why the language reference couldn't contain non-alphanumeric characters, although this won't help for Google. But in this case, "from" would be the thing to look up, so I'm not sure I see it as such a serious problem. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4